« Lotus Collaboration Rated "Ultimate Leader" in Support | Main| How to Identify the Soft Evidence for Impending Failure »

Is Lotus A Smart Choice?

Category IBM/Lotus Linux Ubuntu
The good news is that IBM understands Lotus collaboration as dead-central to their "Smart Work" initiative. Bob Picciano, the Lotus GM, has written up his attack points at CIO.com, and then took time for a conference call with some bloggers (thanks to Nathan Freeman for his transcript).

There is more to Picciano's analysis than a C-level,
marketing cold-call for reducing cost. I'm reading his words as a shift into the core strengths of the Lotus platform, and a revitalized effort to engage customers. Not just customers as in Enterprise Businesses, but customers as people who are as diverse as those with strained resources in developing economies, as well as those working with mashups against huge data-centers. It's a smart message.

The timing is late for Lotus.

What Lotus Notes does well, no one else can touch. But, IBM's competition delivered a smoother GUI earlier, provided more appealing hosting options, and created lock-in by tying the customer's assets into a single platform. The years of building out with Workplace, the slow maturation of Sametime, an awkward UI to Notes (pre-8.5), and weak data integration with Domino has taken a toll on the public image of Lotus.

Lotus Notes is the only collaboration platform that can be delivered as a full-featured client on Linux, Macintosh and Windows. That is an amazing capability. Yet, even in the Ubuntu Linux stronghold of Free Open-Source Software, there is no recognition for Domino, and very little for Notes. That is a stunning disconnect.

The Ubuntu 199 Exam Objectives actually requires Linux System Administrators to understand the process of integrating with Microsoft Exchange:

125.4 Configure Evolution mail client (Weight: 2)

Description: Candidates should be able to configure Evolution to work with a variety of server types and mail protocols. This objective includes the secure configuration of POP3, IMAP, SMTP as well as the integration with an Exchange mail server. Candidates should also be able to set up filters in Evolution to manage spam and other email.

Key files, terms, and utilities include:
  • evolution
  • ~/.evolution/*
  • evolution-exchange


IBM has all the right pieces to build a new customer base, but that opportunity has many challenges. I think a lot of the Lotus faithful have become so accustomed to being an underdog, that there is a community expectation that no one but the Disciples of Domino understand the product. Many of us who have lived with the rise of Lotus Notes have accepted an industry insulation that lacks appreciation for our virtues in security and stability. It's a mistake to ignore public perception.

Google Apps is awesome. It's becoming it's own trend, and university after university are discarding their messaging infrastructure for Google's. And, Microsoft ? Their Exchange 2010 is just not half-bad. It's had a serious update, most of which was cooked off-stage with little pre-announcements, and it's scheduled for an early debut. They have also done a great job in building up a hosted solution, and that has been years in the making. And like it or not, Sharepoint is taking up a lot of oxygen.

It is possible for Lotus Notes to adapt and morph into a platform which is better accepted. But first, there needs to be a hard stare at some tough realities. Rejected technologies never rebound.

Let me point out a famous struggle between Microsoft and WordPerfect. The European Committee for Interoperable Systems has just published their findings in support for the EU Commission's recent preliminary findings, on January 15, 2009, that Microsoft violated antitrust law. On page eleven, there is a chart of the dominance of Microsoft Word over Wordperfect. Look at that curve for Wordperfect, because it's the shape of a plumetting demise that never, ever recovers.

Technologies just don't have comebacks. Companies might readjust, but no one is going to revisit Token Ring or fire up the Iridium satellite network and SmallTalk will never resurge. The trajectories of  technology on a down slope are boringly consistent at SimplyHired.com or Indeed.com.

Smart Work for Lotus is going to have to extend beyond new economies of lower cost. Bob said that it takes smarter people to implement the Smart initiative. That's a good line. I'm hoping it has many meanings. I'd like to see real integration and interoperability into other open-standard and open-source platforms. It'd be great to have Lotus Symphony as a pre-load on Netbooks. The pricing of the Ubuntu PPA for Lotus Notes (and marketing) needs to be nudged forward. Even LotusLive holds promise.

Smart Work is going to be hard work, but IBM/Lotus can rebuild if they are working towards a new base.





Technorati Tags: , ,

Comments

Gravatar Image9 - Sorry I was too stupid to see that the latest comment is at the top. I'll leave now and buy some new glasses.

Gravatar Image8 - I wonder why my first comment disappeared!? It wasn't all bad about Domino. Just that if you are a long term Domino consultant your armour should be quite strong. I'd like to see real integration and interoperability into other open-standard and open-source platforms too.

Gravatar Image7 - If you have been in the Notes and Domino business for some time your armour should be quite good. If you say Technologies just don't have comebacks what about Javascript (quite dead some years ago but took a huge revival with Ajax)!?
I think from IBM's position Domino works quite well nowadays.

Gravatar Image6 - Thanks for the comments. I actually think that Picciano is doing the right thing, and I'm not intending to dogpile on Lotus for their faults. Bob, in particular, is actually publishing, speaking, and meeting with the trend setters. He is putting himself, and Lotus, in front of the parade.

I'm just hoping that the on-going development of the platform is focused on building new alliances, and integrating with newer technologies.

Gravatar Image5 - Our problem is we cannot use a lot of Lotus products because of compatibility issues across platforms and a mere configuration.

Can't use Quickr Connectors if :
- Notes is multi-user (required for Roaming & OS Security)
- on Linux
- on Mac
So we do not distribute them.

Can't use Sametime Advanced :
- 6 months for Windows only Notes 8.5 plug-ins is a worry
- our Mac users cannot use it
- our Linux users cannot use it
No point putting information somewhere where all our users cannot get to.

Sametime A/V Meetings or P2P :
Our Linux and Mac users are once again left out again here with a reduced feature set, so more issues here when one of the other OSs try to connect to a meeting, then there are problems. Whole thing becomes itchy.

Then Connections, oh, Firefox 2 ? See ya, and with no support for Activities on Mac and some Linux.

So with an organisation that is not completely Windows (and not Single User notes installs), we are only getting Notes Mail & Apps with Sametime Awareness (not including NAT troubles).

Now we have a rich client that consumes a hell of a lot of resources, but we cannot compensate by switching to 64-bit to compensate for RAM. JRE CAD, VMWare devies and Admins are suffering.

Now opensource, most OSs, 64-bit as well and you get software that works with the latest and greatest... Unlike another gripe with VMWare, where you cannot use it to test your apps on up and coming OSs because they ony seem to support them 6mnths to a year after they have been released.

So why are we throwing our money at propriety stuff ? It seems to be slow and less compatible with everyone and it is winding me up.


Gravatar Image4 - I see Google a bigger threat than Microsoft. IBM has been too slow to response to this dynamic changes. I am not sure LotusLive is the answer. All of us who depend on the Lotus world need to adapt at a faster pace then ever.

Gravatar Image3 - Thanks for a thoroughly depressing albeit accurate post on the state of the yellow world. IBM has been doing a lot of things right lately, but the timing is late. Too late? Hopefully not. Novell walked a similar path and even with superior technology never found their way back (like Lotus, in a market that they created). IBM now has the dual threat of Google and MS to contend with as well as the trend to hosted/cloud services. I think we will see a definitive direction in the next 18-24 months.

Gravatar Image2 - Well said. Is Domino being reborn or just hanging on like Novell does or Apple did for so many years before being reborn, Apple that is, not Novell just yet.
It is possible for a large company to sustain a program for decades and bide their time waiting for the change in public side to catch up to them.
Maybe that is where we are, maybe we are past it, only time will tell.

Gravatar Image1 - Great points, it will be interesting to see where things go from here. And I hope you're wearing a bulletproof, crush-proof, cut-proof and flame-proof suit of armor.

Post A Comment

:-D:-o:-p:-x:-(:-):-\:angry::cool::cry::emb::grin::huh::laugh::rolleyes:;-)