Silence on Slashdot?
Category
Yesterday, Slashdot.Org had a feature article on IBM's Inexpensive Notes/Domino Push Against MS. And, almost no one in the Lotus Blogsphere seems to have noticed. I've already written on this topic, and posted it in a more popular tech site, so I've said my peace.
The Slashdot article brought out the flame wars (of course), but there was some reasoned commentary which demonstrates that Lotus Notes 8 is perceived as "new and improved."
Oddly, on the eve of a massive SQL Server security debacle, I'd expect there to have been more discussions about security and encryption.
Yesterday, Slashdot.Org had a feature article on IBM's Inexpensive Notes/Domino Push Against MS. And, almost no one in the Lotus Blogsphere seems to have noticed. I've already written on this topic, and posted it in a more popular tech site, so I've said my peace.
The Slashdot article brought out the flame wars (of course), but there was some reasoned commentary which demonstrates that Lotus Notes 8 is perceived as "new and improved."
Oddly, on the eve of a massive SQL Server security debacle, I'd expect there to have been more discussions about security and encryption.
- 


Comments
Good for you, Philip, for posting in the forum.
Posted by Jack Dausman At 12:27:22 AM On 05/01/2008 | - Website - |
Posted by Philip Storry At 11:42:41 PM On 04/30/2008 | - Website - |
I would have expected more hits to this post than the paltry 23 you currently have. May I offer a suggestion? For something like this, you might have tried a different title. I know, you should not have to do that, but to drive more awareness you have to have "Lotus," Notes," or "Lotus on Linux" in the title to get the traffic.
If that is what you want.
This was a good link, one that deserves more attention from the Lotus Community. But I am thankful that you shared it. The comments were "normal," but, like you showed, there were some good nuggets in them.
Thanks for sharing.
Posted by Gregg Eldred At 09:25:13 PM On 04/30/2008 | - Website - |